| To: | Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] xfs_repair: suggest reboot after dangerous repair |
| From: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 04 Dec 2013 13:42:42 -0600 |
| Cc: | xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20131204193822.GU1935@xxxxxxx> |
| References: | <52826206.3080106@xxxxxxxxxx> <20131204193822.GU1935@xxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.1 |
On 12/4/13, 1:38 PM, Ben Myers wrote: > On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 11:14:46AM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote: >> If a "dangerous" repair (repair of a readonly mounted fs) >> has been done, suggest an immediate reboot upon completion. >> >> Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> >> TBH, I don't know how "dangerous" dangerous is. Is this >> still required? > > Was there a crash or something after a repair that led to > this patch? > > Reviewed-by: Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx> > No, it was generated by a "bug" saying that it was impossible to run fsck.xfs on a root filesystem. That was largely an RTFM kind of thing but since it's normal for some systems to come up w/ RO-root in rescue mode, and people are used to being able to run e2fsck in that mode, it might be worth adding a little help to our tool to accomplish the same thing. -Eric |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] xfs_repair: suggest reboot after dangerous repair, Ben Myers |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 2/2] xfs free the list of recovery items on error., Ben Myers |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] xfs_repair: suggest reboot after dangerous repair, Ben Myers |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] xfs_repair: suggest reboot after dangerous repair, Rich Johnston |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |