[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ANNOUNCE] xfsprogs v3.2.0-alpha2

To: Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] xfsprogs v3.2.0-alpha2
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 03:00:23 -0800
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Rich Johnston <rjohnston@xxxxxxx>, xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20131203224354.GR1935@xxxxxxx>
References: <5293A699.20908@xxxxxxx> <20131128104002.GC26927@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20131128211858.GR10988@dastard> <20131129080538.GA31310@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20131203221714.GY10988@dastard> <20131203224354.GR1935@xxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 04:43:54PM -0600, Ben Myers wrote:
> IIRC last time we discussed this I expressed a preference for focussing
> on the 3.2.0 release, but did not object to a 3.1.12 either.  I think
> Eric followed up and asked if Christoph had specific concerns that
> should prompt a 3.1.12 release.  Now I think it's probably just best to
> focus on the xfs_repair bits for 3.2.0.

My concern is pretty simple: we have a big batch of minor and not so
minor fixes that I want to get out to our users.  We've done releases
about every 3 month for the last couple years, but we've not done any
for 6 month by now.

I have to admit I'm a bit out of the loop on the v5 repair work, but if
Dave feels confident that he can get it done soon we should aim for a
3.2.0 release after that.  If not it's more than time to get a 3.1.12
out and I'd be happy to do the work for it.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>