xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] xfstest generic/280: wait for setquota to finish before umou

To: Rich Johnston <rjohnston@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfstest generic/280: wait for setquota to finish before umount
From: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 10:24:23 +1100
Cc: Guangyu Sun <guangyu.sun@xxxxxxxxxx>, "xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx" <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <529DF220.9060208@xxxxxxx>
References: <1382637381-4847-1-git-send-email-guangyu.sun@xxxxxxxxxx> <529DF220.9060208@xxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 09:00:48AM -0600, Rich Johnston wrote:
> This has been committed.
> 
> Thanks
> --Rich
> 
> commit 527eeb43e5c7cfd642d81bc3c12e746d2a3733ff
> Author: Guangyu Sun <guangyu.sun@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Date:   Thu Oct 24 17:56:21 2013 +0000
> 
>     xfstest generic/280: wait for setquota to finish before umount

Rich, I know you read the email I sent about trying to
introduce some conventions for patch subject lines for xfstests
commits.  Cleanliness in the commit history is important, and it's
something that we need to focus on to ensure we all commit patches
using the same conventions.

Hence if you are going to commit patches independently, can you can
you please rewrite the commit messages to follow the conventions I
outlined?

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>