| To: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] fs: fix iversion handling |
| From: | Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 3 Dec 2013 12:40:54 +0200 |
| Cc: | <linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>, NFS list <linux-nfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20131203094507.GD4906@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20131119151707.GA13412@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20131202173636.GA17724@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <529DA5C6.7040403@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20131203094507.GD4906@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130625 Thunderbird/17.0.7 |
On 12/03/2013 11:45 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 11:35:02AM +0200, Boaz Harrosh wrote: >> Hi Christoph >> >> What happens with all other filesystems exported under KNFSD? >> >> As I understand inode_inc_iversion() is used in NFSv4 and up, >> what will increment the inode-version on changed attributes >> for them? > > It's used by the filesystem for the change attribute that NFSDd > can optionally use. Most filesystsems don't support it and work > okay enough when NFS exported. No other filesystem will need > to adopt for this patch specificly, given that no other filesystem > uses this infrastructure. > OK Thanks, I did not know that. I assumed change-attribute is naturally supported. I will look at ext4 example and wire up exofs. Because it is very important for me to support the change-attribute properly. Thanks you Boaz |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: XFS: possible memory allocation deadlock in kmem_alloc (mode:0x250), Emmanuel Lacour |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 12/18] ocfs2: use generic posix ACL infrastructure, Christoph Hellwig |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] fs: fix iversion handling, Christoph Hellwig |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] fs: fix iversion handling, J. Bruce Fields |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |