xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] xfs: fix the comment explaining xfs_trans_dqlockedjoin

To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: fix the comment explaining xfs_trans_dqlockedjoin
From: Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2013 09:26:20 -0600
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20131115173415.GA19381@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20131106114536.GA18548@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20131115173415.GA19381@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 09:34:15AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Not the most important patch ever, but I think it should still be picked
> up :)

Sure.  We'll get it in once the merge window closes.

-Ben

> On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 03:45:36AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
> > 
> > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_dquot.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_dquot.c
> > index cd2a10e..4117286 100644
> > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_dquot.c
> > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_dquot.c
> > @@ -295,8 +295,8 @@ xfs_trans_mod_dquot(
> >  /*
> >   * Given an array of dqtrx structures, lock all the dquots associated and 
> > join
> >   * them to the transaction, provided they have been modified.  We know 
> > that the
> > - * highest number of dquots of one type - usr, grp OR prj - involved in a
> > - * transaction is 2 so we don't need to make this very generic.
> > + * highest number of dquots of one type - usr, grp and prj - involved in a
> > + * transaction is 3 so we don't need to make this very generic.
> >   */
> >  STATIC void
> >  xfs_trans_dqlockedjoin(
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > xfs mailing list
> > xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
> ---end quoted text---
> 
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>