xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] xfs: fix the comment explaining xfs_trans_dqlockedjoin

To: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: fix the comment explaining xfs_trans_dqlockedjoin
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 09:34:15 -0800
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20131106114536.GA18548@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20131106114536.GA18548@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Not the most important patch ever, but I think it should still be picked
up :)

On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 03:45:36AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_dquot.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_dquot.c
> index cd2a10e..4117286 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_dquot.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_dquot.c
> @@ -295,8 +295,8 @@ xfs_trans_mod_dquot(
>  /*
>   * Given an array of dqtrx structures, lock all the dquots associated and 
> join
>   * them to the transaction, provided they have been modified.  We know that 
> the
> - * highest number of dquots of one type - usr, grp OR prj - involved in a
> - * transaction is 2 so we don't need to make this very generic.
> + * highest number of dquots of one type - usr, grp and prj - involved in a
> + * transaction is 3 so we don't need to make this very generic.
>   */
>  STATIC void
>  xfs_trans_dqlockedjoin(
> 
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
---end quoted text---

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>