| To: | Brian Foster <bfoster@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH v2 00/11] xfs: introduce the free inode btree |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 13 Nov 2013 08:17:11 -0800 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1384353427-36205-1-git-send-email-bfoster@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1384353427-36205-1-git-send-email-bfoster@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
I have to admit that I haven't followed this series as closely as I should, but could you summarize the performance of it? What workloads does it help most, what workloads does it hurt and how much? |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 35/36] repair: Increase default repair parallelism on large filesystems, Christoph Hellwig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH v2 01/11] xfs: refactor xfs_ialloc_btree.c to support multiple inobt numbers, Christoph Hellwig |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH v2 01/11] xfs: refactor xfs_ialloc_btree.c to support multiple inobt numbers, Christoph Hellwig |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH v2 00/11] xfs: introduce the free inode btree, Brian Foster |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |