xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH v3] xfstests generic/320: heavy rm workload test

To: Eryu Guan <eguan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] xfstests generic/320: heavy rm workload test
From: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 09:11:19 +1100
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1384243184-19406-1-git-send-email-eguan@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <1384243184-19406-1-git-send-email-eguan@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 03:59:44PM +0800, Eryu Guan wrote:
> This test is based on generic/273, a regression test for commit
> 
> 9a3a5da xfs: check for stale inode before acquiring iflock on push
> 
> On unpatched kernel, rm processes would hang.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <eguan@xxxxxxxxxx>

Looks ok now.

Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx>
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>