[Top] [All Lists]

Re: xfstest failures

To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: xfstest failures
From: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 07:34:23 +1100
Cc: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20131107134848.GA1163@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20131106105451.GA31283@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20131106161825.GU1935@xxxxxxx> <527A887F.2030807@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20131107081710.GC25157@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <527B948C.9060905@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20131107132739.GA16608@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <527B99C3.6090903@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20131107134848.GA1163@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 05:48:48AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 07:46:43AM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> > Would an expected failure be only for tests which are known to be
> > not-fixed anywhere?
> Exactly.  If you want to be fancy we could allow a drop-in file to
> override it if you want something for RHEL testing or similar

Yup, that's exactly what the expunged test files are for. :)


Dave Chinner

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>