| To: | Mark Tinguely <tinguely@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: xfstest failures |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 7 Nov 2013 12:59:03 -0800 |
| Cc: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <527B94A5.20004@xxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20131106105451.GA31283@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20131106194417.GF6188@dastard> <527A9F67.6000208@xxxxxxx> <20131107081634.GB25157@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <527B94A5.20004@xxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 07:24:53AM -0600, Mark Tinguely wrote: > >>>xfs/206 has it's own mkfs filter: > >>> > >>>http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2013-10/msg00777.html > > > >And why is this patch not merged? > > > > It was never reviewed. Consider it reviewed: Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 31/37] db: Unwind the IO stack on exit, Christoph Hellwig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [PATCH v4] xfs: fix unlock in xfs_bmap_add_attrfork, Mark Tinguely |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: xfstest failures, Eric Sandeen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: xfstest failures, Christoph Hellwig |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |