[Top] [All Lists]

Re: xfstest failures

To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: xfstest failures
From: Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2013 14:49:01 -0600
Cc: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20131107134848.GA1163@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20131106105451.GA31283@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20131106161825.GU1935@xxxxxxx> <527A887F.2030807@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20131107081710.GC25157@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <527B948C.9060905@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20131107132739.GA16608@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <527B99C3.6090903@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20131107134848.GA1163@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 05:48:48AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 07:46:43AM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> > Would an expected failure be only for tests which are known to be
> > not-fixed anywhere?
> Exactly.  If you want to be fancy we could allow a drop-in file to
> override it if you want something for RHEL testing or similar

Good idea to have an override, since everybody has multiple flavors to test
which all have different sets of tests that fail.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>