| To: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: xfstest failures |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 7 Nov 2013 06:00:04 -0800 |
| Cc: | Mark Tinguely <tinguely@xxxxxxx>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <527B9C80.4060304@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20131106105451.GA31283@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20131106194417.GF6188@dastard> <527A9F67.6000208@xxxxxxx> <20131107081634.GB25157@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <527B94A5.20004@xxxxxxx> <527B9C80.4060304@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 07:58:24AM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote: > We had a really high rate of change there for a while, and keeping up on > all fronts was tough. > > There's been a bit of defensiveness in the replies here; let's get past > that & take Christoph's list of failures and just get them taken care of. > > I'll try to go through the failures and either pick up existing patches, > or get new ones written, and get a new series on the list to get this all > cleaned up. It also would be use if everyone could resend patches more than say 2 weeks old that haven't moved forward or outright rejected. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: xfstest failures, Eric Sandeen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: xfstest failures, Eric Sandeen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: xfstest failures, Eric Sandeen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: xfstest failures, Eric Sandeen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |