|To:||Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>|
|Subject:||Re: xfstest failures|
|From:||Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>|
|Date:||Thu, 7 Nov 2013 06:00:04 -0800|
|Cc:||Mark Tinguely <tinguely@xxxxxxx>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx|
|References:||<20131106105451.GA31283@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20131106194417.GF6188@dastard> <527A9F67.6000208@xxxxxxx> <20131107081634.GB25157@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <527B94A5.20004@xxxxxxx> <527B9C80.4060304@xxxxxxxxxxx>|
On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 07:58:24AM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote: > We had a really high rate of change there for a while, and keeping up on > all fronts was tough. > > There's been a bit of defensiveness in the replies here; let's get past > that & take Christoph's list of failures and just get them taken care of. > > I'll try to go through the failures and either pick up existing patches, > or get new ones written, and get a new series on the list to get this all > cleaned up. It also would be use if everyone could resend patches more than say 2 weeks old that haven't moved forward or outright rejected.
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|