xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: xfstest failures

To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: xfstest failures
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2013 06:00:04 -0800
Cc: Mark Tinguely <tinguely@xxxxxxx>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <527B9C80.4060304@xxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20131106105451.GA31283@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20131106194417.GF6188@dastard> <527A9F67.6000208@xxxxxxx> <20131107081634.GB25157@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <527B94A5.20004@xxxxxxx> <527B9C80.4060304@xxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 07:58:24AM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> We had a really high rate of change there for a while, and keeping up on
> all fronts was tough.
> 
> There's been a bit of defensiveness in the replies here; let's get past
> that & take Christoph's list of failures and just get them taken care of.
> 
> I'll try to go through the failures and either pick up existing patches,
> or get new ones written, and get a new series on the list to get this all
> cleaned up.

It also would be use if everyone could resend patches more than say 2
weeks old that haven't moved forward or outright rejected.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>