[Top] [All Lists]

Re: xfstest failures

To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: xfstest failures
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2013 05:48:48 -0800
Cc: Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <527B99C3.6090903@xxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20131106105451.GA31283@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20131106161825.GU1935@xxxxxxx> <527A887F.2030807@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20131107081710.GC25157@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <527B948C.9060905@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20131107132739.GA16608@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <527B99C3.6090903@xxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 07:46:43AM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> Would an expected failure be only for tests which are known to be
> not-fixed anywhere?

Exactly.  If you want to be fancy we could allow a drop-in file to
override it if you want something for RHEL testing or similar

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>