[Top] [All Lists]

Re: xfstest failures

To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: xfstest failures
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2013 07:24:28 -0600
Cc: Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20131107081710.GC25157@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20131106105451.GA31283@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20131106161825.GU1935@xxxxxxx> <527A887F.2030807@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20131107081710.GC25157@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0
On 11/7/13, 2:17 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 12:20:47PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>> that's right, it's a known bug w/ a testcase but no fix yet.
>> I looked a bit, but ugh, xfsdump.
> Maybe it's time you come up with an xfail mechanism at least?

What's the proposal there, a "fail" group for things known to still
fail everywhere?

so i.e. ./check -x fail ?  I can easily send a patch for that if
that's what folks want.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>