xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: xfstest failures

To: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: xfstest failures
From: Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2013 14:14:01 +0100
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=mail.ud10.udmedia.de; h= date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=beta; bh=/Hm48CaRiEgnvUm39gZEM9i738 Rpf7gjNTkrny7CfOo=; b=pMmMVf7GRDhWzCbNbriSAOZUBrCn2hsfRYs+0ckRdM PLi0rTvoFQvxFw+s1b2CxUkcb1Bi9vctKaxKCgVwy5ljSJyi7UgOnoJoiG3gU3l2 soA/a4Uvwpg0fz9TZSLPBbP6YcGZ8mlk3HAXKEYhYeUthzbRkBvGdjLJQ9jMFhFq U=
In-reply-to: <20131107115722.GB11434@dastard>
References: <20131106105451.GA31283@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20131106194417.GF6188@dastard> <20131107082234.GA30243@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20131107115722.GB11434@dastard>
On 2013.11.07 at 22:57 +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> This is a perfect example of what is wrong with the way XFS is being
> maintained right now.
> 
> That's the fundamental problem here.  When I change stuff, I can't
> get the maintainers to do anything with the code I post unless I put
> on my cranky pants and start shouting and making people cry. I hate
> having to do this, but it seems like it's the only thing that the
> maintainers respond to.
> 
> Quite frankly, XFS upstream is completely dysfunctional right now
> and, as such, it's no longer a fun thing to work on.

Then why don't you just set up a couple of git trees on git.kernel.org
and ask Linus to pull directly from those?

-- 
Markus

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>