| To: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: xfstest failures |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 7 Nov 2013 04:23:28 -0800 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20131107115722.GB11434@dastard> |
| References: | <20131106105451.GA31283@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20131106194417.GF6188@dastard> <20131107082234.GA30243@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20131107115722.GB11434@dastard> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 10:57:22PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > However, Christoph, you should not have found this stuff given it's > been almost 5 months since I sent patches to handle these cases. > This is a perfect example of what is wrong with the way XFS is being > maintained right now. > That's the fundamental problem here. When I change stuff, I can't > get the maintainers to do anything with the code I post unless I put > on my cranky pants and start shouting and making people cry. I hate > having to do this, but it seems like it's the only thing that the > maintainers respond to. > I've not seen them reposted either. While review and commit latencie can vary and be very high the most effective counter measure is frequent reposts. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Kind Attention !!!, Reserve Bank of India |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: xfstest failures, Markus Trippelsdorf |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: xfstest failures, Christoph Hellwig |
| Next by Thread: | Re: xfstest failures, Markus Trippelsdorf |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |