[Top] [All Lists]

Re: xfstest failures

To: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: xfstest failures
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2013 04:01:57 -0800
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20131107115722.GB11434@dastard>
References: <20131106105451.GA31283@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20131106194417.GF6188@dastard> <20131107082234.GA30243@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20131107115722.GB11434@dastard>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 10:57:22PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> Actually, it doesn't. v4 configs give the same notrun output, which
> is wrong but doesn't result in a failure (hence I didn't notice it).
> Now that you've reported it I've just found a bug in the
> _requires_attr_v1 function that makes it always fail and notrun the
> test....

It fails for me running latests xfstests, latest xfsprogs an latest xfs
tree in a x86 VM running the default mkfs options.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>