xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] xfs: fix the comment explaining xfs_trans_dqlockedjoin

To: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: fix the comment explaining xfs_trans_dqlockedjoin
From: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2013 10:50:17 -0200
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20131106114536.GA18548@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Mail-followup-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
References: <20131106114536.GA18548@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Reviewed-by: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@xxxxxxxxxx>

On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 03:45:36AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_dquot.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_dquot.c
> index cd2a10e..4117286 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_dquot.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_dquot.c
> @@ -295,8 +295,8 @@ xfs_trans_mod_dquot(
>  /*
>   * Given an array of dqtrx structures, lock all the dquots associated and 
> join
>   * them to the transaction, provided they have been modified.  We know that 
> the
> - * highest number of dquots of one type - usr, grp OR prj - involved in a
> - * transaction is 2 so we don't need to make this very generic.
> + * highest number of dquots of one type - usr, grp and prj - involved in a
> + * transaction is 3 so we don't need to make this very generic.
>   */
>  STATIC void
>  xfs_trans_dqlockedjoin(
> 
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

-- 
Carlos

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>