On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 12:52:07AM -0500, Michael L. Semon wrote:
> >>> but the 3.10.x kernel you're running will IIRC; use "-m crc=1" on the
> >>> mkfs.xfs
> >>> commandline from a git mkfs.xfs.
Did tried and ended with the same problem for filesystem mounting.
> >> root@bpserver:/storage/devel/git-xfsprogs# mkfs/mkfs.xfs -f -m crc=1
> >> /dev/sdb3
> >> However, it should be dirent (ftype=1 in the above output) that keeps a
> >> vanilla 3.10.17 kernel from mounting the resulting filesystem:
> >> [438326.624667] XFS (sdb3): Version 5 superblock detected. This kernel has
> >> EXPERIMENTAL support enabled!
> >> [438326.624667] Use of these features in this kernel is at your own risk!
> >> [438326.624762] XFS (sdb3): Superblock has unknown incompatible features
> >> (0x1) enabled.
> >> [438326.624762] Filesystem can not be safely mounted by this kernel.
> > looks this problem is irrelevant to CRC check is enabled or not, and
> > Eric has fixed it:
> > commit 31625f28ad7be67701dc4cefcf52087addd88af4
> > xfs: don't emit corruption noise on fs probes
Will try this.
> >> I don't know if the CentOS kernel has any extra patches that would enable
> >> this filesystem to be mounted.
I use vanilla longterm 3.10.x, not CentOS kernel, that is too old for my
> >> There might be a way to bisect or revert the git xfsprogs back before
> >> dirent
> >> and giving that a try. However, it seems best to start working with
> >> v5/CRC
> >> XFS starting with kernel 3.11. If my luck with recent AIO commits was
> >> better,
> >> I'd recommend 3.12 instead because that's the real correct answer,
> >> problems
> >> aside.
I have to use longterm kernel and 3.10.x is the latest available. As I have
seen the commit for more ACLs there, I expected it should be possible to
get it working for this version
> That stated, I found some time to revert the git xfsprogs, and there was
> success in making more than 25 ACLs on vanilla kernel 3.10.17. Again,
> this is not recommended--the later kernel and userspace patches are there
> for good reason--but the output is pasted after my closing.
I will repeat your directions and test it. However, if you as XFS devels do
not see these to be stable enough to be used in production environment, I
may still revert to some other solution (unix groups) even if these are a
night mare to administer for my situation.
Thanks for all the info and advices.
Tomas Kasparek E-mail: kasparek@xxxxxxxxxxxx
CVT FIT VUT Brno, L127 Web: http://www.fit.vutbr.cz/~kasparek
Bozetechova 1, 612 66 Fax: +420 54114-1270
Brno, Czech Republic Phone: +420 54114-1220
GPG: 2F1E 1AAF FD3B CFA3 1537 63BD DCBE 18FF A035 53BC
May the command line live forever!
Description: PGP signature