xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Aw: Re: xfs_repair segfaulting in phase 3

To: Jan Yves Brueckner <jyb@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Aw: Re: xfs_repair segfaulting in phase 3
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2013 10:12:46 -0500
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <trinity-561a8e56-e327-4695-b591-ab534badbca2-1382700222681@3capp-gmx-bs25>
References: <trinity-9e6d7620-812f-48a7-9a7e-3098368ff59a-1376307533158@3capp-gmx-bs36>, <52273823.6050704@xxxxxxxxxxx> <trinity-561a8e56-e327-4695-b591-ab534badbca2-1382700222681@3capp-gmx-bs25>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0.1
On 10/25/13 6:23 AM, Jan Yves Brueckner wrote:
> Thanks a lot for taking care, 
>  
> I just teted with 3.2 alpha1 and had these results:
>  
> corrupt block 21 in directory inode 39869938
>         will junk block
> xfs_dir3_data_read_verify: XFS_CORRUPTION_ERROR
> corrupt block 34 in directory inode 39869938
>         will junk block
> xfs_dir3_data_read_verify: XFS_CORRUPTION_ERROR
> corrupt block 35 in directory inode 39869938
>         will junk block
> xfs_dir3_data_read_verify: XFS_CORRUPTION_ERROR
> corrupt block 51 in directory inode 39869938
>         will junk block
> xfs_da3_node_read_verify: XFS_CORRUPTION_ERROR
> Segmentation fault
>  
>  
> Should I go on with git latest?

Hm, trying to remember which "3 patches" I referred to.  ;)

This one:

commit 44dae5e6804408b4123a916a2738b73e21d8c61e
Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:   Thu Sep 12 20:56:36 2013 +0000

    xfs_repair: test for bad level in dir2 node

is indeed committed post 3.2.0-alpha1.

Let me try to remember what the other two were, and where
they're at.

-Eric

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>