xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: projid32bit=1 default in xfsprogs-3.2.0

To: Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: projid32bit=1 default in xfsprogs-3.2.0
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 16:57:36 -0500
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20131015214910.GX10553@xxxxxxx>
References: <525C1C15.7020204@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20131014211659.GI5663@dastard> <20131014212347.GB1935@xxxxxxx> <525C6108.6010108@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20131015194609.GC32095@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20131015204342.GA24997@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20131015212214.GC1935@xxxxxxx> <20131015213110.GA5895@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20131015214910.GX10553@xxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8
On 10/15/13 4:49 PM, Ben Myers wrote:
> Hey,
> 
> On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 02:31:10PM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 04:22:14PM -0500, Ben Myers wrote:
>>> The tags are out there:
>>> http://oss.sgi.com/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=xfs/cmds/xfsprogs.git;a=tags
>>
>> I managed to somehow miss them.  Sorry!
> 
> np
>  
>>> That's an interesting idea.  We hadn't discussed a 3.1.12 release.  No
>>> particular objection to doing that, it's just that we didn't branch for the
>>> v3.0.5->v3.1.0 set of releases.  Maybe it is better if we all focus on 
>>> 3.2.0.
>>
>> With git you can easily branch from a past commit, e.g.:
>>
>> hch@brick:~/work/xfsprogs$ git checkout -b release-3.1 v3.1.11
>> Switched to a new branch 'release-3.1'
> 
> Yep.  If folks want a 3.1.12 we should certainly kick the idea around a bit.
> I'm just guessing that most would prefer to focus on a 3.2.0 in the near term.
> Maybe I'm mistaken about that though.  ;)

I'm not super keen to divide the focus; I've already updated the distros I
care about to 3.2.0-alpha1, so I wouldn't go backwards to a 3.1.12.

hch, do you have a specific need for it?

-Eric

> Thanks,
>       Ben
> 

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>