On 10/15/13 4:49 PM, Ben Myers wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 02:31:10PM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 04:22:14PM -0500, Ben Myers wrote:
>>> The tags are out there:
>> I managed to somehow miss them. Sorry!
>>> That's an interesting idea. We hadn't discussed a 3.1.12 release. No
>>> particular objection to doing that, it's just that we didn't branch for the
>>> v3.0.5->v3.1.0 set of releases. Maybe it is better if we all focus on
>> With git you can easily branch from a past commit, e.g.:
>> hch@brick:~/work/xfsprogs$ git checkout -b release-3.1 v3.1.11
>> Switched to a new branch 'release-3.1'
> Yep. If folks want a 3.1.12 we should certainly kick the idea around a bit.
> I'm just guessing that most would prefer to focus on a 3.2.0 in the near term.
> Maybe I'm mistaken about that though. ;)
I'm not super keen to divide the focus; I've already updated the distros I
care about to 3.2.0-alpha1, so I wouldn't go backwards to a 3.1.12.
hch, do you have a specific need for it?