xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Bug#725971: xfsprogs: config.guess/config.sub out of date for arm64

To: Colin Watson <cjwatson@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Bug#725971: xfsprogs: config.guess/config.sub out of date for arm64
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 14:29:30 -0700
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, 725971@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20131015212448.GM32337@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20131010133811.GK32337@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20131015194211.GA32095@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20131015212448.GM32337@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, 725971@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Resent-cc: XFS Development Team <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Resent-date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 21:33:02 +0000
Resent-from: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Resent-message-id: <handler.725971.B725971.138187257918219@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Resent-sender: Debian BTS <debbugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Resent-to: debian-bugs-dist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 10:24:48PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> I looked, but there's nothing to send; the xfsprogs repository doesn't
> contain those files.  They're updated by the configure target in
> Makefile, which is run as part of ./release.sh via "make dist".  (Good;
> this should be as automatic as possible.)

Oh, forgot about that.

> IOW, any new upstream release will contain updated files as long as the
> developer who built the release has current libtool etc. installed.  But
> of course this should be fixed to auto-update at build time in the
> Debian packaging anyway, since we want to be able to port to new
> architectures without having to upload lots of new source packages or
> take lots of new upstream releases at the same time; it makes life so
> much easier.

As said, I don't disagree with your patch at all, I was just asking for
an additional patch which turned out not to be nessecary.

Thanks a lot!

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>