[Top] [All Lists]

Re: xfs corrupted

To: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: xfs corrupted
From: Emmanuel Florac <eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 21:52:51 +0200
Cc: "xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx" <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <F0730252-EF33-4452-957A-FA33DAD43913@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: Intellique
References: <1381826507281-35009.post@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20131015203434.2f336fd8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <525D8D67.2090301@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <F0730252-EF33-4452-957A-FA33DAD43913@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Le Tue, 15 Oct 2013 13:07:22 -0600 vous Ãcriviez:

> That is very low RAM for a system with two big arrays attached. So if
> repair finds it needs to repair something it's going to take a long
> time.
> http://xfs.org/index.php/XFS_FAQ#Q:_Which_factors_influence_the_memory_usage_of_xfs_repair.3F

With a recent xfs_repair (3.x) it's large enough. I've checked
similar arrays recently on 4 GB machines in a couple of minutes.

Emmanuel Florac     |   Direction technique
                    |   Intellique
                    |   <eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
                    |   +33 1 78 94 84 02

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>