|To:||Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>|
|Subject:||Re: [PATCH] xfstests XFS: verify extended attributes after multi-stream xfsdump/xfsrestore|
|From:||Rich Johnston <rjohnston@xxxxxxx>|
|Date:||Tue, 8 Oct 2013 09:21:13 -0500|
|References:||<524AF8AE.5030300@xxxxxxx> <20131007193912.256265551@xxxxxxx> <20131008005317.GU4446@dastard> <52535864.8020503@xxxxxxxxxxx>|
|User-agent:||Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0|
On 10/07/2013 07:57 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
On 10/7/13 7:53 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:Two tests, please. move all the common parts into common/dump, and write them as two separate tests. That way we can easily track what test is failing just by looking at what harness test is failing...I'm not quite convinced that it's 2 separate tests, TBH. It's the same root cause; I guess there is a slightly different outcome because if you hit the same root cause enough times, you'll segfault.
Multiple DMF offline files are successfully restored but the attrs are lost. I wanted to show/test that case.
I agree with Eric that it is the same root cause but because can occur with successful dumps and does not segfault, Thats why the 2 tests.
That's the only difference in test #2. (and the segfault isn't fixed AFAIK).
Agreed and I will note that in the test description.
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|
|Previous by Date:||ÄÅ hayatÄnda bozulan ezberler, son uygulamalar ve yeni trendler, Asli Cebi|
|Next by Date:||Re: [PATCH] xfstests XFS: verify extended attributes after multi-stream xfsdump/xfsrestore, Rich Johnston|
|Previous by Thread:|
|Next by Thread:|
|Indexes:||[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]|