On 9/26/13 8:30 AM, Ronnie Tartar wrote:
> Stan, looks like I have directory fragmentation problem.
>
> xfs_db> frag -d
> actual 65057, ideal 4680, fragmentation factor 92.81%
>
> What is the best way to fix this?
http://xfs.org/index.php/XFS_FAQ#Q:_The_xfs_db_.22frag.22_command_says_I.27m_over_50.25._Is_that_bad.3F
We should just get rid of that command, TBH.
So your dirs are in an average of 65057/4680 or about 14 fragments each.
Really not that bad, in the scope of things.
I'd imagine that this could be more of your problem:
> The
> folders are image folders that have anywhere between 5 to 10 million images
> in each folder.
at 10 million entries in a dir, you're going to start slowing down on inserts
due to btree management. But that probably doesn't account for multiple
seconds for
a single file.
So really,it's not clear *what* is slow.
> It takes about 2.5 to 3.5 seconds to write a single file.
strace with timing would be a very basic way to get a sense of what is slow;
is it the file open/create? How big is the file, are you doing buffered or
direct IO?
On a more modern OS you could do some of the tracing suggested in
http://xfs.org/index.php/XFS_FAQ#Q:_What_information_should_I_include_when_reporting_a_problem.3F
but some sort of profiling (oprofile, perhaps) might tell you where time is
being spent in the kernel.
When you say suddenly started, was it after a kernel upgrade or other change?
-Eric
|