|Subject:||Re: xfs hardware RAID alignment over linear lvm|
|From:||Stewart Webb <stew@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>|
|Date:||Thu, 26 Sep 2013 10:28:00 +0100|
|Cc:||Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx" <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>|
|References:||<CAE3v2EaODFud_S_BzuSjtwGwuNBXhvL0RiPB1P5QroF45Obwbw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <52435327.9080607@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <2F959FD9-EF28-4495-9D0B-59B93D89C820@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20130925215713.GH26872@dastard> <CAE3v2EYVnXiWq1n8AJ0+Y2eifZyhV08S4uLwf6B6mXXWAzBzRA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <5243FCD6.4000701@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>|
My workload is primarily reads (about 80%+ read operations) - so defaults will most likely
be best suited on this occasion.
I was simply trying to follow the guidelines on the XFS wiki to
the best of my ability, and felt I didn't understand the impact of using this via LVM.
Now I feel I understand enough to continue in what I need to do.
On 26 September 2013 10:22, Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|
|Previous by Date:||Re: xfs hardware RAID alignment over linear lvm, Stan Hoeppner|
|Next by Date:||Issues and new to the group, Ronnie Tartar|
|Previous by Thread:||Re: xfs hardware RAID alignment over linear lvm, Stan Hoeppner|
|Next by Thread:||Re: xfs hardware RAID alignment over linear lvm, Dave Chinner|
|Indexes:||[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]|