| To: | "xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx" <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: xfs hardware RAID alignment over linear lvm |
| From: | Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 25 Sep 2013 15:53:24 -0600 |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <52435A1B.8040207@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <CAE3v2EaODFud_S_BzuSjtwGwuNBXhvL0RiPB1P5QroF45Obwbw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <52435327.9080607@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <2F959FD9-EF28-4495-9D0B-59B93D89C820@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <52435A1B.8040207@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
On Sep 25, 2013, at 3:48 PM, Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> So keeping the example, 3 arrays x 10 data disks, would this be su=512k and >> sw=30? > > No. In this configuration, as far as XFS is concerned LVM doesn't exist > in the stack because it doesn't change the RAID geometry, so you ignore it. OK and if this were md linear where the file system definitely would be created across all disks? Chris Murphy |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: xfs hardware RAID alignment over linear lvm, Stan Hoeppner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: xfs hardware RAID alignment over linear lvm, Dave Chinner |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: xfs hardware RAID alignment over linear lvm, Stan Hoeppner |
| Next by Thread: | Re: xfs hardware RAID alignment over linear lvm, Dave Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |