xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] stable_kernel_rules.txt: Exclude networking from stable rule

To: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] stable_kernel_rules.txt: Exclude networking from stable rules
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2013 11:51:04 -0700
Cc: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, stephen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@xxxxxxxxxx>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Rob Landley <rob@xxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-doc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, LKML <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1379615474.22168.13.camel@joe-AO722>
References: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1309191229480.32035@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20130919.135628.1201613770803318193.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <alpine.LRH.2.02.1309191359300.12162@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1379615474.22168.13.camel@joe-AO722>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
This is also the preferred way to do it for XFS.  Maybe word it in a way
that we can easily add subsystems.

To me it generally seems to be the best way to do it - having random Ccs
and lots of stable trees doesn't seem like a very good way of handling
it.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>