xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] xfstests: fix set-default test in btrfs/001

To: Josef Bacik <jbacik@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfstests: fix set-default test in btrfs/001
From: David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2013 15:30:29 +0200
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1379537307-21681-1-git-send-email-jbacik@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Mail-followup-to: dsterba@xxxxxxx, Josef Bacik <jbacik@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
References: <1379537307-21681-1-git-send-email-jbacik@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: dsterba@xxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2012-12-30)
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 04:48:27PM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
> We were actually testing this improperly, there was a bug in the set default
> code so we weren't actually honoring the 0 subvolid properly.  To fix this we
> need to get the subvolid for the subvol we want to set as the default and use
> that in the command.  With this patch we now pass again with the fix for the 0
> subvolid.  Thanks,
> 
> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxx>

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>