| To: | Mark Tinguely <tinguely@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] xfstests: xfs directory unbalance assert test |
| From: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 18 Sep 2013 07:29:17 +1000 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20130917145959.333796933@xxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20130917145946.124195107@xxxxxxx> <20130917145959.333796933@xxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 09:59:47AM -0500, Mark Tinguely wrote: > +# Fill the filesystem. > +FSSTRESS_ARGS="-z -s 1378390208 -fsymlink=1 -n7500000 -p4 -d $SCRATCH_MNT" > +$FSSTRESS_PROG $FSSTRESS_ARGS >> $seqres.full 2>&1 > + > +cd $SCRATCH_MNT >> $seqres.full 2>&1 > +sync > +# A debug XFS may assert in the remove due to a directory bug. > +rm -rf * Wouldn't this be better: sync rm -rf $SCRATCH_MNT/* Remember, xfstests runs as root and so having a "rm -rf *" anywhere in a test is a disaster just waiting to happen.... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] [RFC] xfs: increase inode cluster size for v5 filesystems, Dave Chinner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] xfstests: v2 xfs directory unbalance assert test, Dave Chinner |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] xfstests: xfs directory unbalance assert test, Eric Sandeen |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH] xfsprogs: initialize filetype for xfs_name_dot, Eric Sandeen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |