| To: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] xfstests: v2 xfs directory unbalance assert test |
| From: | Mark Tinguely <tinguely@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 17 Sep 2013 15:03:02 -0500 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <5238AF75.2020905@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20130917192538.230164044@xxxxxxx> <5238AF75.2020905@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:9.0) Gecko/20120122 Thunderbird/9.0 |
On 09/17/13 14:37, Eric Sandeen wrote: On 9/17/13 2:25 PM, Mark Tinguely wrote:This tests triggers an assert in the XFS directory unbalance code. This test originally written by Brian Foster and suggestions from Micheal Semon. Signed-off-by: Mark Tinguely<tinguely@xxxxxxx> --- v1->v2: remove clean up. remove $seqres.full before test. remove scratch mount. 11g -> calculate 11g bytes. check for failing mkfs and mount. add a safer removal of the scratch files. put into auto group and "long" group so people can opt out: this test almost an hour on my test box.Is there any way to do a more targeted test than 1hr of fsstress? :( No, I pruned the test down from a 5 hr test to 1 hr test. (TBH I didn't follow the bug, so not sure what it takes to repro) Otherwise seems fine. Reviewed-by: Eric Sandeen<sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx> Thanks. --Mark. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] xfstests: v2 xfs directory unbalance assert test, Eric Sandeen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] xfstests: check for valid input to _scratch_mkfs_sized, Mark Tinguely |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] xfstests: v2 xfs directory unbalance assert test, Eric Sandeen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] xfstests: v2 xfs directory unbalance assert test, Dave Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |