xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: xfsprogs: update version for 3.2.0-alpha1

To: Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: xfsprogs: update version for 3.2.0-alpha1
From: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 08:38:55 +1000
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx, rjohnston@xxxxxxx
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20130916205637.GD1935@xxxxxxx>
References: <20130916205637.GD1935@xxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 03:56:37PM -0500, Ben Myers wrote:
> xfsprogs: update version for 3.2.0-alpha1

I'd say this is a major feature and infrastructure
update across the entire xfsprogs package, and in that case a
PKG_MAJOR bump is warranted, not PKG_MINOR.

i.e. We're shooting for a 4.0 release, not 3.2...

> 
> Update the VERSION and doc/CHANGES file for alpha release, 3.2.0-alpha1
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Rich Johnston <rjohnston@xxxxxxx>
> 
> ---
>  VERSION      |    4 ++--
>  configure.ac |    2 +-
>  doc/CHANGES  |    4 ++++
>  3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> Index: b/VERSION
> ===================================================================
> --- a/VERSION 2013-09-16 15:50:29.544368912 -0500
> +++ b/VERSION 2013-09-16 15:50:37.993732514 -0500
> @@ -2,6 +2,6 @@
>  # This file is used by configure to get version information
>  #
>  PKG_MAJOR=3
> -PKG_MINOR=1
> -PKG_REVISION=11
> +PKG_MINOR=2
> +PKG_REVISION=0-alpha1

To make it easy for packaging, 3.99.0 would probably fit better with
various distro package naming/numbering schemes...

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>