|To:||Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>|
|Subject:||Re: [PATCH, RFC] xfstests: add d_type checking to fsstress|
|From:||Mark Tinguely <tinguely@xxxxxxx>|
|Date:||Mon, 16 Sep 2013 17:22:12 -0500|
|User-agent:||Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:9.0) Gecko/20120122 Thunderbird/9.0|
On 09/16/13 16:55, Eric Sandeen wrote:
This patch adds a "-D" switch to fsstress so that every time we call readdir, we stat the dentry& compare it's st_mode to the d_type. If -D is specified only once, it ignores DT_UNKNOWN. If specified twice, it considers DT_UNKNOWN to be an error. It skips paths of "./." and "./.." so that we only look at files newly created within the filesystem. This could be used in an xfstest; it's noisy on a failures so would break expected output. Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen<sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx> --- fsstress doesn't usually do validation, but it's such a handy framework for creating a ton of random files, this seems like an ok place to put it. What do folks think?
I tried v5 and v4 with and without inode fields in the directory. This looks good to me. Like the 2 levels of the test. --Mark.
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|
|Previous by Date:||Re: xfsprogs: update version for 3.2.0-alpha1, Eric Sandeen|
|Next by Date:||Re: xfsprogs: update version for 3.2.0-alpha1, Dave Chinner|
|Previous by Thread:||[PATCH, RFC] xfstests: add d_type checking to fsstress, Eric Sandeen|
|Next by Thread:||Re: [PATCH, RFC] xfstests: add d_type checking to fsstress, Dave Chinner|
|Indexes:||[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]|