| To: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS: Assertion failed: first <= last && last < BBTOB(bp->b_length), file: fs/xfs/xfs_trans_buf.c, line: 568 |
| From: | Mark Tinguely <tinguely@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 16 Sep 2013 12:30:51 -0500 |
| Cc: | Brian Foster <bfoster@xxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20130916154423.GA455@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <52165830.8050006@xxxxxxxxxx> <52325369.1070001@xxxxxxx> <20130916154423.GA455@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:9.0) Gecko/20120122 Thunderbird/9.0 |
On 09/16/13 10:44, Christoph Hellwig wrote: On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 06:51:05PM -0500, Mark Tinguely wrote:The secret to tripping over the bug is run the test until fsstress fills the filesystem before removing the files. So an error handling? I use the test: #!/bin/sh ltp/fsstress -z -s 1378390208 -fsymlink=1 -n9999999 -p4 -d /test2 cd /test2 sync rm -rf * If your filesystem is smaller, decrease the -n to make the test faster. I have still not gotten a core, though Michael Semon sent one.It would be useful if we could wire this up for xfstests Nod --Mark. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: XFS: Assertion failed: first <= last && last < BBTOB(bp->b_length), file: fs/xfs/xfs_trans_buf.c, line: 568, Christoph Hellwig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: XFS: Assertion failed: first <= last && last < BBTOB(bp->b_length), file: fs/xfs/xfs_trans_buf.c, line: 568, Michael L. Semon |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS: Assertion failed: first <= last && last < BBTOB(bp->b_length), file: fs/xfs/xfs_trans_buf.c, line: 568, Christoph Hellwig |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS: Assertion failed: first <= last && last < BBTOB(bp->b_length), file: fs/xfs/xfs_trans_buf.c, line: 568, Michael L. Semon |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |