xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: XFS: Assertion failed: first <= last && last < BBTOB(bp->b_length),

To: Mark Tinguely <tinguely@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: XFS: Assertion failed: first <= last && last < BBTOB(bp->b_length), file: fs/xfs/xfs_trans_buf.c, line: 568
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 08:44:23 -0700
Cc: Brian Foster <bfoster@xxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <52325369.1070001@xxxxxxx>
References: <52165830.8050006@xxxxxxxxxx> <52325369.1070001@xxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 06:51:05PM -0500, Mark Tinguely wrote:
> The secret to tripping over the bug is run the test until fsstress
> fills the filesystem before removing the files. So an error
> handling?
> 
> I use the test:
> 
> #!/bin/sh
> 
> ltp/fsstress -z -s 1378390208 -fsymlink=1 -n9999999 -p4 -d /test2
> cd /test2
> sync
> rm -rf *
> 
> If your filesystem is smaller, decrease the -n to make the test faster.
> 
> I have still not gotten a core, though Michael Semon sent one.

It would be useful if we could wire this up for xfstests

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>