| To: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Re: XFS: Assertion failed: first <= last && last < BBTOB(bp->b_length), file: fs/xfs/xfs_trans_buf.c, line: 568 |
| From: | Mark Tinguely <tinguely@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 29 Aug 2013 07:37:42 -0500 |
| Cc: | Brian Foster <bfoster@xxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20130826041330.GU6023@dastard> |
| References: | <52165830.8050006@xxxxxxxxxx> <20130826041330.GU6023@dastard> |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:9.0) Gecko/20120122 Thunderbird/9.0 |
On 08/25/13 23:13, Dave Chinner wrote: xfs: fix calculation of the number of node entries in a dir3 node From: Dave Chinner<dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx> The calculation doesn't take into account the size of the dir v3 header, so overestimates the hash entries in a node. This causes directory buffer overruns when splitting and merging nodes. Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner<dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx> --- Makes sense to me for the inode v3 assert. Reviewed-by: Mark Tinguely <tinguely@xxxxxxx>The remove assert with the same test must be in common code; it can be triggered in both versions of the inode (Linux 3.10 - TOT). The assert on the remove may require the test to be run until the filesystem is full before doing the remove. |
| Previous by Date: | VÃÅenà E-mail uÅÃvateÄa;, ÄuboÅ Marcinek |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] xfstests: btrfs/003: regression test for subvol delete V2, David Sterba |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] Re: XFS: Assertion failed: first <= last && last < BBTOB(bp->b_length), file: fs/xfs/xfs_trans_buf.c, line: 568, Michael L. Semon |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] Re: XFS: Assertion failed: first <= last && last < BBTOB(bp->b_length), file: fs/xfs/xfs_trans_buf.c, line: 568, Ben Myers |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |