xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 2/2] xfs: check LSN ordering for v5 superblocks during recove

To: Mark Tinguely <tinguely@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] xfs: check LSN ordering for v5 superblocks during recovery
From: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 07:31:26 +1000
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <521E6680.80105@xxxxxxx>
References: <1377688967-6480-1-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1377688967-6480-3-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <521E625A.2070109@xxxxxxx> <20130828210223.GO12779@dastard> <521E6680.80105@xxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 04:07:12PM -0500, Mark Tinguely wrote:
> On 08/28/13 16:02, Dave Chinner wrote:
> >On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 03:49:30PM -0500, Mark Tinguely wrote:
> >>On 08/28/13 06:22, Dave Chinner wrote:
> >>>From: Dave Chinner<dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>
> >>Looks good. Nice to get into Linux 3.12 and possibly back to stable.
> >
> >Why stable? It's v5 only code, and everyon knows that is still in
> >the experimental stage....
> 
> yep.

That doesn't answer my question. You had to have some reason for
suggesting a possible stable backport for this code after reviewing
it, and I'm interested to know what it was...

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>