xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] xfstests: generic/255: Execute only if blocksize <= 4096

To: chandan <chandan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfstests: generic/255: Execute only if blocksize <= 4096
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 11:46:52 -0500
Cc: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>, sekharan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <3942763.p7a9her5Nt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <2909046.09LYLQvZ6q@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <44437668.FEX1DiRokR@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <521B664B.7030404@xxxxxxxxxx> <3942763.p7a9her5Nt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8
On 8/27/13 7:16 AM, chandan wrote:
> On Monday, August 26, 2013 09:29:31 AM Eric Sandeen wrote:
>>
>> Just as a sanity check, does it also fail on xfs for 64k block sizes on 
>> ppc64?
>>
> 
> Yes, it does fail as shown below:
> 

(removing linux-btrfs for now):

Hohum, I get failures on 2k and even 4k blocksize xfs (and ext4) on ppc64 as 
well.
(this was on a 3.10 kernel)

Have you seen this?

I guess I'm a little reluctant to restrict the test to <=4k until we understand
what all the issues are and at least see it passing on the smaller block
sizes... do they work for you?

-Eric

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>