xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree

To: Jeremy Kerr <jk@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree
From: Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 10:56:54 -0500
Cc: Dwight Engen <dwight.engen@xxxxxxxxxx>, cbe-oss-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>, Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-next@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Gao feng <gaofeng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linuxppc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <52145E6C.80404@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20130820172052.1f0d89ddf6a1a40ef70333fd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20130820120702.000b044e@xxxxxxxxxx> <201308202246.30869.arnd@xxxxxxxx> <20130821010822.220f592a@xxxxxxxxxx> <52145E6C.80404@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Hey Dwight,

On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 02:30:04PM +0800, Jeremy Kerr wrote:
> > Yes, I agree. The other filesystems that take an Opt_uid as well do use
> > current_user_ns() and not init_user_ns. They also do a uid_valid()
> > check and fail the mount (or fallback to GLOBAL_ROOT_UID). So I think
> > that would look like this:
> 
> Looks good to me. Builds and mounts as expected.
> 
> Acked-by: Jeremy Kerr <jk@xxxxxxxxxx>

Could you repost this patch with the right subject and a commit header?  Given
Jeremy's Ack I think we could proceed to pull this in.

Regards,
        Ben

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>