xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree

To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree
From: Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 10:54:16 -0500
Cc: cbe-oss-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>, Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Dwight Engen <dwight.engen@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-next@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Jeremy Kerr <jk@xxxxxxxxxx>, linuxppc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Gao feng <gaofeng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20130821102246.4e3c4c8fe549d8c7760da96d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20130820172052.1f0d89ddf6a1a40ef70333fd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20130820120702.000b044e@xxxxxxxxxx> <20130820192844.GC5262@xxxxxxx> <20130821102246.4e3c4c8fe549d8c7760da96d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Hey Stephen,

On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 10:22:46AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Aug 2013 14:28:44 -0500 Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > I'd prefer not to break Stephen's tree two days in a row.  We could just 
> > revert
> > d6970d4b726c in the xfs tree for the time being as Stephen has done, but 
> > given
> > the choice would prefer the fix.  Do you have a preference between the two
> > approaches that Dwight has posted?  The first seems more conservative...
> 
> I will automatically revert that commit when I merge the xfs tree until
> some other solution is forthcoming (so you don't have to do the revert in
> the xfs tree).

Gah.  That makes sense.  ;)

> This does need to be fixed fairly soon, though.

Agreed, thanks.

-Ben

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>