xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree

To: Dwight Engen <dwight.engen@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree
From: Jeremy Kerr <jk@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 14:30:04 +0800
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>, cbe-oss-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx>, linux-next@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Gao feng <gaofeng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linuxppc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20130821010822.220f592a@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20130820172052.1f0d89ddf6a1a40ef70333fd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20130820120702.000b044e@xxxxxxxxxx> <201308202246.30869.arnd@xxxxxxxx> <20130821010822.220f592a@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130803 Thunderbird/17.0.8
Hi all,

> Yes, I agree. The other filesystems that take an Opt_uid as well do use
> current_user_ns() and not init_user_ns. They also do a uid_valid()
> check and fail the mount (or fallback to GLOBAL_ROOT_UID). So I think
> that would look like this:

Looks good to me. Builds and mounts as expected.

Acked-by: Jeremy Kerr <jk@xxxxxxxxxx>

Cheers,


Jeremy

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>