xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 48/49] xfs: Add read-only support for dirent filetype field

To: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 48/49] xfs: Add read-only support for dirent filetype field
From: Geoffrey Wehrman <gwehrman@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 13:48:15 -0500
Cc: Ric Wheeler <rwheeler@xxxxxxxxxx>, Mark Tinguely <tinguely@xxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20130819052813.GA6023@dastard>
References: <5208E243.9080403@xxxxxxx> <20130813005024.GS12779@dastard> <520A53E8.6030604@xxxxxxx> <20130814075042.GE6023@dastard> <20130814184729.GA4604@xxxxxxx> <520C6E39.7030501@xxxxxxxxxx> <20130815180400.GF3783@xxxxxxx> <520D4B1B.4080602@xxxxxxxxxx> <20130816140811.GA30422@xxxxxxx> <20130819052813.GA6023@dastard>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.14 (2007-02-12)
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 03:28:13PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
| Participation requires being open about what you are doing. Posting
| designs and ideas for comment, communicating your vision for the
| future, posting code early and often, etc. That enables others to
| participate at every stage and means that problems/issues are caught
| early and rejection/acceptance occurs long before final code is
| written. That's the way open source software is developed and most
| of the XFS developer community understand that.

This is a statement we can all agree on.

| Except, it appears, the maintainers.

Don't blame the maintainer.  I am not the maintainer.  Send your insults
my way, not to the maintainer.


-- 
Geoffrey Wehrman  651-683-5496  gwehrman@xxxxxxx

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>