On 08/15/2013 07:25 AM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 04:27:56PM +0800, Jeff Liu wrote:
>> From: Jie Liu <jeff.liu@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> At xfs_ail_min(), we do check if the AIL list is empty or not before
>> returning the first item in it with list_empty() and list_first_entry().
>>
>> This can be simplified a bit with a new list operation routine that is
>> the list_first_entry_or_null() which has been introduced by:
>>
>> commit 6d7581e62f8be462440d7b22c6361f7c9fa4902b
>> list: introduce list_first_entry_or_null
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jie Liu <jeff.liu@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> fs/xfs/xfs_trans_ail.c | 5 +----
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_ail.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_ail.c
>> index 0eda725..e91d160 100644
>> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_ail.c
>> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_ail.c
>> @@ -68,10 +68,7 @@ xfs_log_item_t *
>> xfs_ail_min(
>> struct xfs_ail *ailp)
>> {
>> - if (list_empty(&ailp->xa_ail))
>> - return NULL;
>> -
>> - return list_first_entry(&ailp->xa_ail, xfs_log_item_t, li_ail);
>> + return list_first_entry_or_null(&ailp->xa_ail, xfs_log_item_t, li_ail);
>> }
>
> At this point, it can become a static inline function in
> xfs_trans_priv.h. And while you are touching this, remove the
> typedef...
Ok, I'll take care of that.
Thanks,
-Jeff
|