| To: | "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@xxxxxxx>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxx>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>, LKML <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: page fault scalability (ext3, ext4, xfs) |
| From: | Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 14 Aug 2013 16:38:12 -0700 |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20130814230648.GD22316@xxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <520BB9EF.5020308@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20130814194359.GA22316@xxxxxxxxx> <520BED7A.4000903@xxxxxxxxx> <20130814230648.GD22316@xxxxxxxxx> |
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 4:06 PM, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 01:50:02PM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote: >> >> Would a plain old fallocate() do the trick, or does it actually need >> zeros written to it? > > It would be better to write zeros to it, so we aren't measuring the > cost of the unwritten->written conversion. At the risk of beating a dead horse, how hard would it be to defer this part until writeback? --Andy |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] xfs: Simplify xfs_ail_min() with list_first_entry_or_null(), Dave Chinner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: xfs_repair deletes files after power cut, Dave Chinner |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: page fault scalability (ext3, ext4, xfs), Theodore Ts'o |
| Next by Thread: | Re: page fault scalability (ext3, ext4, xfs), Theodore Ts'o |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |