xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: ***** SUSPECTED SPAM ***** [PATCH 00/50] xfs: patches for 3.12

To: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: ***** SUSPECTED SPAM ***** [PATCH 00/50] xfs: patches for 3.12
From: Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 16:28:34 -0500
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20130812225513.GA12719@xxxxxxx>
References: <1376304611-22994-1-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20130812225513.GA12719@xxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 05:55:13PM -0500, Ben Myers wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 08:49:21PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> > 
> > This is a rebase of the reviewed series of kernel patches I recently
> > posted here:
> > 
> > http://oss.sgi.com/pipermail/xfs/2013-July/028207.html
> > 
> > It addresses all the review comments except for one from Christoph
> > about the IOP_SIZE removal - I'll send a followup patch in a couple
> > of days to remove all the rest of IOP_ macros...
> > 
> > The log space problems from the optimisations have been fixed - the
> > fix went into patch 44 of this series, and cascaded through 45 and
> > 46 as well. Those patches will need reviewing. The problematic
> > workload has been running for 16 hours here without failure on a
> > small (10MB) log, so AFAICT the problem is fixed.
> > 
> > There is one new patch - the fix to the use-after-free of clean
> > buffer items when a transaction is cancelled - and that is at the
> > end of the series.
> 
> Pulled in patches 1 through 42.

Pulled in 43 through 47.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>