On 07/19/13 01:44, Dave Chinner wrote:
From: Dave Chinner<dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner<dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
diff --git a/libxfs/xfs_dir2_node.c b/libxfs/xfs_dir2_node.c
index bdce1b3..222f08c 100644
--- a/libxfs/xfs_dir2_node.c
+++ b/libxfs/xfs_dir2_node.c
9th chunk in libxfs/xfs_dir2_node.c patch
@@ -1795,9 +1793,9 @@ xfs_dir2_node_addname_int(
/*
* Look at the current free entry. Is it good enough?
*
- * The bests initialisation should be wher eteh bufer is read in
+ * The bests initialisation should be where the bufer is read in
* the above branch. But gcc is too stupid to realise that bests
- * iand the freehdr are actually initialised if they are placed
+ * and the freehdr are actually initialised if they are placed
* there, so we have to do it here to avoid warnings. Blech.
*/
bests = xfs_dir3_free_bests_p(mp, free);
A clean up in the xfsprogs master branch requires this to be removed.
--Mark.
|