xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 10/49] libxfs: sync dir2 kernel differences

To: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/49] libxfs: sync dir2 kernel differences
From: Mark Tinguely <tinguely@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2013 17:04:02 -0500
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1374216324-8781-11-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <1374216324-8781-1-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1374216324-8781-11-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:9.0) Gecko/20120122 Thunderbird/9.0
On 07/19/13 01:44, Dave Chinner wrote:
From: Dave Chinner<dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx>

Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner<dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx>
---


diff --git a/libxfs/xfs_dir2_node.c b/libxfs/xfs_dir2_node.c
index bdce1b3..222f08c 100644
--- a/libxfs/xfs_dir2_node.c
+++ b/libxfs/xfs_dir2_node.c

9th chunk in libxfs/xfs_dir2_node.c patch

@@ -1795,9 +1793,9 @@ xfs_dir2_node_addname_int(
                /*
                 * Look at the current free entry.  Is it good enough?
                 *
-                * The bests initialisation should be wher eteh bufer is read in
+                * The bests initialisation should be where the bufer is read in
                 * the above branch. But gcc is too stupid to realise that bests
-                * iand the freehdr are actually initialised if they are placed
+                * and the freehdr are actually initialised if they are placed
                 * there, so we have to do it here to avoid warnings. Blech.
                 */
                bests = xfs_dir3_free_bests_p(mp, free);

A clean up in the xfsprogs master branch requires this to be removed.

--Mark.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>