xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH v2] xfsprogs/io: add readdir command

To: Mark Tinguely <tinguely@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] xfsprogs/io: add readdir command
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2013 15:39:13 -0500
Cc: Brian Foster <bfoster@xxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <5203A5B7.4020102@xxxxxxx>
References: <1374669868-14075-1-git-send-email-bfoster@xxxxxxxxxx> <5203A5B7.4020102@xxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8
On 8/8/13 9:05 AM, Mark Tinguely wrote:

> Could we get a little info for the xfs_io man page?
> 

Yup, otherwise xfs/293 fails :)


# ./check xfs/293
FSTYP         -- xfs (non-debug)
PLATFORM      -- Linux/x86_64 bp-05 3.11.0-rc1+
MKFS_OPTIONS  -- -f -bsize=4096 /dev/sdb2
MOUNT_OPTIONS -- -o context=system_u:object_r:nfs_t:s0 /dev/sdb2 /mnt/scratch

xfs/293 10s ... - output mismatch (see 
/mnt/test2/git/xfstests/results/xfs/293.out.bad)
    --- tests/xfs/293.out       2013-03-27 12:57:49.318520102 -0500
    +++ /mnt/test2/git/xfstests/results/xfs/293.out.bad 2013-08-08 
15:38:30.881221070 -0500
    @@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
     QA output created by 293
     Silence is golden
    +readdir not documented in the xfs_io manpage
     ...
     (Run 'diff -u tests/xfs/293.out 
/mnt/test2/git/xfstests/results/xfs/293.out.bad' to see the entire diff)
Ran: xfs/293
Failures: xfs/293
Failed 1 of 1 tests


/me pats self on back ;)

-Eric

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>