| To: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: A short digression on FOSS (Re: understanding speculative preallocation) |
| From: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 28 Jul 2013 22:12:51 -0500 |
| Cc: | Jay Ashworth <jra@xxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20130729024105.GC13468@dastard> |
| References: | <20130729000247.GA13468@dastard> <32553786.2492.1375056392388.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20130729024105.GC13468@dastard> |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7 |
On 7/28/13 9:41 PM, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 08:06:32PM -0400, Jay Ashworth wrote: >> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: "Dave Chinner" <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> >>> Sure, they have diverged signficant;y as we've backported various >>> bits of XFs fetaures and bug fixes back into RHEL6. As have every >>> other distro that doesn't track mainline directly. That's why you >>> need to look at the kernel source package to know what code the >>> distro is running. >> >> And... all the way back to Jason's original question: >> >> The way that you get the information out of a kernel/kernel RPM to >> determine which XFS version it's running... is? Cause it's clearly >> not obvious to either him or me. > > The "version" of XFS that you are running is that of the > kernel you are running. i.e. 2.6.32-279.x.y or 2.6.32-358.x.y. IOWS: There is no spoon. ;) -Eric > Cheers, > > Dave. > |
| Previous by Date: | Submit Music Videos to be run on our site, The Daily Rocker |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] xfs: introduce object readahead to log recovery, Zhi Yong Wu |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: A short digression on FOSS (Re: understanding speculative preallocation), Dave Chinner |
| Next by Thread: | Re: A short digression on FOSS (Re: understanding speculative preallocation), Stan Hoeppner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |