|Subject:||Re: understanding speculative preallocation|
|From:||Jason Rosenberg <jbr@xxxxxxxxxxxx>|
|Date:||Fri, 26 Jul 2013 16:38:21 -0400|
|Cc:||Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx|
|Dkim-signature:||v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=squareup.com; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=/yfDy6ekZSIQmjKaI6vaubb9Vnx7OcUFbq3FeZo8Q/M=; b=cZVZrBFJ1IUZTpzycnrmy1TJ2Z4PEUEV6BkZ5f2aZ53r6VfphN8Zyvnn+gpseuZpVL QCAUmd/HXXDuy91rEgBgdJmWAQ6gl2xlwMLUvtbWVyjBAu8RbjS5JwaDeKzxaYRjsc9o xjqOhoVVFfZX+DDM7stIMTQW1DfJAzRZCkD+w=|
|References:||<1374823420041-35002.post@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20130726115021.GO13468@dastard> <CAA+BczQesNL2VmFmrcBNKXcM-Sfx0bXkXPRP5xMx6=Bv+NWrUA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <51F2CD8B.8080207@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>|
Thanks for the info (most of it was, in fact, news to me). I'm an application developer trying to debug a disk space problem, that's all. So far, I've tracked it down to being an XFS issue.
So you are saying there's no public information that can correlate XFS versioning to CentOS (or RHEL) versioning?
Sad state of affairs.
If anyone can volunteer this info (if available to you) I'd be much appreciative.
Regardless, is there a version history for XFS vis-a-via mainline Linux?
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 3:27 PM, Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|
|Previous by Date:||Re: [PATCH 26/49] xfs: consolidate xfs_utils.c, Mark Tinguely|
|Next by Date:||Re: [PATCH 44/49] xfs: Reduce allocations during CIL insertion, Michael L. Semon|
|Previous by Thread:||Re: A short digression on FOSS (Re: understanding speculative preallocation), Michael L. Semon|
|Next by Thread:||Re: understanding speculative preallocation, Ben Myers|
|Indexes:||[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]|