[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 00/49] xfsprogs: patches for crc-dev branch

To: "Michael L. Semon" <mlsemon35@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/49] xfsprogs: patches for crc-dev branch
From: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 14:44:50 +1000
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <51EDFA5A.7070402@xxxxxxxxx>
References: <1374216324-8781-1-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <51EB80DB.80602@xxxxxxxxx> <20130722233240.GC19986@dastard> <51EDFA5A.7070402@xxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 11:36:58PM -0400, Michael L. Semon wrote:
> On 07/22/2013 07:32 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 02:34:03AM -0400, Michael L. Semon wrote:
> >> On 07/19/2013 02:44 AM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> >>
> >>> Comments, thoughts, flames?
> >>
> >> I was hoping that I could use this 3.12 patchset with a 3.11.0-rc 
> >> kernel, but the xfstests look like a disaster by going that way.  
> > 
> > We'll, if you don't have all the filtering patches that I posted a
> > while back it'll make quite a mess with all the experimental
> > warnings mkfs and repair emit, and the xfs_db tests that modify
> > filesystem structures will all also fail...
> I've been slacking on xfstests updates.  The problem may exist 
> between keyboard and chair, though:  I was trying to copy a merged 
> xfsprogs from one PC to another, then build everything from `make 
> distclean` after deleting /usr/include/xfs.  Something must have 
> gone wrong...won't be the first time...
> > I'll repost them later today...
> I'll take this patchset home and see if any of them were not 
> committed to the xfsprogs git:
> http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2013-06/msg00217.html
> Is this the correct patchset?

Yeah, that's it, thugh I have a more recent version of it locally...


Dave Chinner

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>